ultra frame uk ltd v fielding

ultra frame uk ltd v fielding

Transactions between a company and a shadow director were voidable unless the requisite formalities had been observed. Where a person became a shadow . Dec 1, 2018 - Ultraframe (UK) Ltd v Fielding and others: ChD 27 Jul 2005 . Cited – Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (No 3) ChD ([1968] 1 . Ultraframe (UK) Ltd v Fielding, Northstar Systems Ltd, Seaquest Systems Ltd etc: ChD 27 Jul 2005. December 2, 2018 admin Off Intellectual Property, Torts . [2006] F.S.R. 17; [2005] EWHC 1638 (Ch); HC032C03199, HC02C03545, HC03C0992, HC02C02548; (2005) 28(9) I.P.D. 28069 . Preamble. 1. This is (for the moment) the culmination of a long war of attrition in which the real combatants are Ultraframe (UK) Ltd ('Ultraframe') on one side and . Ultraframe (UK)Limited (Ultraframe) is a major supplier of conservatory roofs in the United Kingdom. Burnden Group Plc (Burnden) is a major competitor and is a . Mr Andrew Hochhauser QC for Ultraframe accepts that the test which will be applied on any proposed appeal is whether the decision below was 'wrong'. It is not . May 22, 2015 - For example, in Ultraframe UK Ltd v Fielding [2005] EWHC 1638 (Ch) it was held that although a de facto director owes directors' duties, the . Download Citation on ResearchGate ULTRAFRAME UK LTD v FIELDING Design right—Infringement—Ownership of design rights—Both parties claiming . Jul 1, 2003 - ULTRAFRAME UK LTD v FIELDING, Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases, Volume 120, Issue 13, 1 January 2003, Pages 435–471 .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z